
Molly Seidel not just won a medal at the Olympics but also millions of hearts. For one, we are all impressed by her performance, grit, and vulnerability. Wonder why a reference to Molly Seidel for a shoe review of Puma Deviate Nitro? That is because she ran in Puma Deviate Nitro Elite shoes at the Olympics, which is the close cousin of Deviate Nitro. 

##### What makes up Puma Deviate Nitro?

Deviate Nitro is a carbon-plated neutral trainer cum racer, positioned just below the Deviate Nitro Elite in Puma’s Nitro Running Shoe lineup. An affordable racer with a carbon plate, this shoe is a greate way to experience what it is like to run in carbon-plated shoes. The shoe is comparable to Nike’s Zoom Fly, in terms of price, positioning, and performance.

<ShoeCard shoeCode="005001000M"></ShoeCard>

The midsole height at the heel is about 38 mm and is the highest in Nitro lineup. The heel-to-toe drop is about 10mm. At a weight of 258g (Men's UK 8) this shoe is not light when compared to other carbon plated racers.

**Midsole**  
The shoe’s midsole is made up of Nitrogen infused EVA foam called "Nitro". The midsole has two layers to accommodate the curved carbon plate called "Innoplate". The carbon plate is shaped such that it is supposed to maximize the energy return at push-off. The plate in the front is split at the big toe so that it can provide stability and propulsion independently to the big toe.

**Upper**  
Upper uses mono-mesh fabric and is very breathable. The fabric is rich and gives good character to the shoe. The mesh holds the shape of the shoe very well. 

**Heel**
Heel is reinforced by a plastic heel counter, but there is no padding at the back. This is probably the cause of heel slippage as many reviews point out. There is a small TPU plate inserted below the heel to add stability, which uses reflective coating to improve night visibility. 

**Bottom sole**  
The bottom sole uses "Puma Grip", and is the best in class. It has plenty of rubber, and feels very robust, and offers solid grip on any surface. Bottom sole is cut such that you can see the carbon plate through it.

<div class="row">
    <div class="col-md-6 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/pdn-weight.jpg" caption="Slightly heavier compared to racers" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
    <div class="col-md-6 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/pdn-heel.jpg" caption="Heel design is the weak point" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
</div>

The shoe is constructed traditionally and is not a rocker. So if you are looking for traditionally constructed shoeswith a carbon plate, this is the one to consider.

##### Why did I consider this shoe?

<div class="avatar-label-1" data-toggle="tooltip" title="VINEET">VI</div>

I was looking for a shoe to replace from my current running shoes ([Reebok Floatride Run Panthea](https://shoegeeks.in/shoe/reebok-floatriderunpanthea-008001001/) and [Nike Pegasus 37](https://shoegeeks.in/shoe/nike-airzoompegasus38-002010038/)). I prefer a shoe that is an all-rounder shoe that can be used for long runs, speed training, or easy runs.  I’ve come across Deviate Nitro through a friend. The technology used in the shoe is very appealing, more importantly, the price point. 

<div class="avatar-label-2" data-toggle="tooltip" title="ARAVIND">AR</div>

I have used Nike ZoomFly for my last marathon, and very happy about it. For the new running season, I was looking for a shoe with a carbon plate and is constructed traditionally. While I like rockers and the snappy foot transition they offer, they feel tiring over a long run because of the adjustments I have to do. I have been using [Velocity Nitro](https://shoegeeks.in/shoe/puma-velocitynitro-005003000/) (check out the [review](https://shoegeeks.in/review/puma-velocitynitro-005003000/)) and I really liked the Nitro foam. So buying Deviate Nitro with Nitro foam is an easy decision. The other factor that favored is the price of Deviate Nitro. If you look hard enough you could find [it under 10,000](https://shoegeeks.in/shoe/puma-deviatenitro-005001000/).  

##### Ride In Deviate Nitro

<div class="avatar-label-1" data-toggle="tooltip" title="VINEET">VI</div> 

I have run about 600+ kilometers already in this shoe. Used it for all kinds of runs in my training, which averages about 100+km a week. My runs include long runs, easy runs, and interval runs. While Deviate Nitro worked well for all kinds of runs, I liked it best for my speed training that includes long intervals and tempo runs.

Innoplate (carbon plate used by Deviate Nitro) as advertised by Puma, gives that extra push which helps to maintain the faster paces over longer distances. Nitrogen infused cushion is really comfortable, and post-run soreness is less compared to
Nike Pegasus 37.

<div class="row">
    <div class="col-6 col-md-6 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/pdn-forefoot.jpg" caption="Airy mesh, and Roomy forefoot" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
    <div class="col-6 col-md-6 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/pdn-grip.jpg" caption="Top of the class traction, and slit to see the carbon plate" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
</div>

<div class="avatar-label-2" data-toggle="tooltip" title="ARAVIND">AR</div>

I have run about 120km in the shoe so far. I have mostly used it for long runs, tempo runs, and recovery runs.  The weight of the shoe is such that I didn’t use it much for shorter interval runs.

**Long Runs**
If you are not used to high-stack shoes, stepping into a shoe of 38mm stack can be unsettling at first. It can feel unstable when you run.  But Puma has done an good job in offering stability despite the high stack. The cushioning is firm (not as firm as Nike React foam, but comes close to it), and the carbon plate adds some more stability. Long runs feel comfortable, and the only complaint is it is hard to run at an easy pace in these shoes. This is not necessarily good, when you want to slow down and run easy towards the latter kilometers of your long run. The shoe feels harsh, and make it hard to run easy.

**Tempo Runs**
This shoe is really made for moderate effort and tempo effort runs. It has an excellent bounce that makes you to put your best for such runs. It’s hard to resist the bounce and get quicker.

**Speed Intervals**
While the shoe is bouncy, the weight of the shoe makes it hard to use it for speed work. It is not as snappy compared to low-profile shoes. Lack of flexibility in the midsole makes it harder to transition the stride and push-off from the ground.  I prefer a low-profile [Liberate Nitro](https://shoegeeks.in/shoe/puma-liberatenitro-005004000/) to Deviate Nitro any day.

##### Fit & Comfort

<div class="avatar-label-1" data-toggle="tooltip" title="VINEET">VI</div> 

The fit of the shoe is excellent, and I use the same size as with Nike, and Reebok. The forefoot is comfortable, and the toe box fits nicely. 

As this is my first carbon-plated shoe, It took me some time to get used to the ride. I found the shoe not so comfortable in the initial days. However, post 100kms is when I got comfortable and really started liking the shoe.

<div class="avatar-label-2" data-toggle="tooltip" title="ARAVIND">AR</div>

I use UK 10 normally and the Deviate Nitro is true to size and fits perfectly. If you’ve used Nike, Asics, or Saucony earlier, same size in Puma Deviate Nitro will probably fit well. The shoe probably needs a few kilometers to get used, especially because of the stack height and somewhat harsher bounce.

I prefer a bigger toe room, and the shape of the shoe offers a very good room to wiggle the toes and helps with toe flexion.  

Because of the higher stack and carbon plate, the shoe is not something you can say is flexible. That makes the transitions harder and can put extra stress on your Achilles, especially if your ankle flexion is not that great.  

Heel slippage is also an issue. While it didn’t bother me much, few of the runners that I know have complained about it.  Consider using the last eyelet in case you have heel slippage. I also would have preferred some padding at the heel for those longer runs.

##### Stability

<div class="avatar-label-2" data-toggle="tooltip" title="ARAVIND">AR</div>

My foot pronation is in the typical range, with Deviate Nitro, I have no problems adapting to the shoe. The stability offered is good. However, because of the high stack height, running on uneven surfaces can get tricky. It is very easy to twist your ankle on roads that you find these days in Bangalore. 

<LightBox src="/images/pdn-testers.jpg" caption="Testing in Action" alt="" ></LightBox>

##### Road Grip

<div class="avatar-label-1" data-toggle="tooltip" title="VINEET">VI</div>

This shoe has excellent traction.  I have tested it on various terrains including tarred roads, trails, loose sand, and muddy roads. It handles the corners and turns very well, makes you feel run confidently no matter what.

<div class="avatar-label-2" data-toggle="tooltip" title="ARAVIND">AR</div>

Like other Nitro shoes that use Puma Grip, this shoe offers exceptional road grip. I could use it on any surface, wet rainy roads, and the shoe just aces it.  Perfectly fit for Indian roads.

##### Aesthetics
<div class="avatar-label-2" data-toggle="tooltip" title="ARAVIND">AR</div>

The colorway that I have (Green Glare) is the best that I have liked so far. Upper fabric adds further class to the shoe.  Every part of the shoe feels very premium; textured laces, and reinforced eyelets, reflective makers, and the aggressive looking Puma stripes.

##### Review Summary

<ReviewSummaryCard shoeCode="005001000M"></ReviewSummaryCard>

<ProsCard
  title="PROS"
  pros={[
    "Excellent bounce and medium-soft cushion make it a good shoe for training longer distances, tempo runs, and even for speed training.",  
    "Very affordable among the carbon plated trainers.",
    "An excellent roadgrip that can ace any kind of surface.",
  ]}
/>

<ConsCard
  title="CONS"
  cons={[
    "Lack of flexibility in the midsole makes it harder to transition at easy paces.",
    "Heel slippage can be an issue for some runners.",
    "It will take a bit longer to get used to the shoe and to feel comfortble",
    "The weight of the shoe is on the higher side, which makes it particularly not suitable for races, compared to other super shoes"
  ]}
/>

<InfoCard title="RECOMMENDATION">
    Puma Deviate Nitro is a reasonably priced carbon plated and high-stack shoe. It is well construcuted, and is recommended as a race trainer to runners training for distances up to marathon. 
</InfoCard>


Puma Deviate Nitro is a well cushioned, high stack neutral trainer with a carbon plate.

Puma Deviate Nitro Review


Ever since the first edition of Kinvara introduced the 4mm heel drop in 2009, it influenced the midsole design of running shoes drastically.  It is now rare to see shoes with heel drop more than 10mm.  In its twelfth edition Saucony Kinvara continues to hold the baton of natural running.  

In Saucony’s running shoe line-up, Kinvara 12 has a special place.  It is the go to shoe for a lightweight, well cushioned, neutral daily trainer.  It is designed to be a very versatile shoe to handle any kind of run, speed work, or marathon. While It is in the same category of daily neutral trainers as Brooks Ghost, Nike Pegasus, and the likes, it is still different. Shoes like Pegasus changed its ways to keep up with the current trend of high stacks, while Kinvara 12 continues to be true to its original design philosophy, yet it stays right at the top of the list of modern neutral trainers.

<ShoeCard shoeCode="006003012M"></ShoeCard>

### What makes up Saucony Kinvara 12?

If you are running in Kinvara for the first time, first thing you will notice is how light it feels for a neutral daily trainer that costs under ₹10,000. It is built as a traditional shoe but with a low heel drop of 4mm. With a published weight of 213g (for US9) and 216g for UK 10 (as we measured it), it is the lightest cushioned daily trainer in the market.  Other shoes in this category, such as Nike Pegasus, Brooks Ghost weigh upwards of 260g. With a stack height of 28mm, it is also the lowest profile amongst its category.

<div class="row">
    <div class="col-md-7 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/skw-sideprofile.jpg" caption="Low profile and flexible" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
    <div class="col-md-5 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/sk-weight.jpg" caption="Lightest daily trainer" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
</div>

**Midsole and Outsole**

Kinvara 12 is made of PWRUN Midsole, which is a light-weight blend of EVA. It is firmer than TPU and PEBA foams, but is very flexible. It naturally bends along with the feet, as we run. As an EVA blend, it is also very durable, so much so that Saucony designers decided to expose the midsole fully with very little outsole rubber on it.

<LightBox src="/images/sk-outsole.jpg" caption="Midsole is fully exposed" alt="" ></LightBox>

**Upper**

The upper is an engineered mesh, and is very well constructed and seems durable. With almost no other overlays, it is very well ventilated and airy.  It is very stretchy, and gives plenty of room for toes to move around while running.  Wider shape of the shoe combined with the upper mesh makes it quite suitable for runners who prefer the shoes to be roomy.

<LightBox src="/images/skw-topview.jpg" caption="Durable engineered mesh, and is highly ventilated" alt="" ></LightBox>

**Heel**

The heel is very well padded at the back and gives plenty of confidence during foot transition at toe-off.  The midsole below the heel is built such that the shoe feels very stable.  The bottom part of the midsole flared out quite a lot (at forefoot and heel), which is probably the reason why the shoe feels stable. 

<div class="row">
    <div class="col-6 col-md-6 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/skw-heel.jpg" caption="Flared out midsole helps stability" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
    <div class="col-6 col-md-6 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/sk-heelpadding.jpg" caption="Well padded heel" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
</div>

### RIDE IN KINVARA

<div class="avatar-label-1" data-toggle="tooltip" title="ADITI">AD</div> 

Truth be told, this is the first time I have tried any other shoe brand than my usual favorite. I have run more than 150kms both at tempo and easy paces and the longest run was ~17kms. The light weight of the shoe surely helps with the pace as the cadence increases.  Furthermore, I'm more aware of the way I’m striding because of the low heel drop and the lower stack height. 

These shoes have speed written all over. If you have been practicing well and are looking for a short-distance race, the shoes will improve your cadence and pace by a notch.  For faster-paced runs such as strides, and tempo runs, the bounce from the midsole comes very handily. Given the lighter weight and extremely flexible midsole, which makes the shoes excellent for uphill running.  


<div class="avatar-label-2" data-toggle="tooltip" title="ARAVIND">AR</div>

With all my recent running in high stack shoes, carbon plates, and rocker profiles, running in Kinvara feels very different, but in a good way.  The shoe didn’t need any break-in, but for a bit of adjustment to low heel drop for the first few km.  Once done, the shoe is as comfortable as it can be.  I have run 130 km so far, the ride experience is as good as the very first day.  

I have used the shoe for interval runs, tempo runs, easy and long runs of more than 25 KM distance.  The shoe is as versatile as it can be.  No matter the type of run, it works very well.  For interval and tempo workouts, it offers enough bounce.  For longer runs, there is enough midsole cushion across the entire foot, and the lighter weight of the shoe keeps me comfortable even in the latter kilometers. However, I may not consider this shoe for training distances beyond 30 KM, as I am better served by shoes that have more cushioning and are much softer.

The low heel drop definitely promotes mid-foot strike better than other shoes that I have used.  Despite being a very flexible shoe, the extra outward flare at the bottom helps the stability. My pronation angles reflect it, and are quite low too at 7 degrees, compared to the 11 degrees that I see in my other shoes.  That said, I don’t expect it to match with stability shoes. For neutral runners wanting slight stability with lightweight, Kinvara could be a good option. Here is how my foot strike and pronation measures (courtesy: [RunMechanics](https://runmechanics.in)).  

<LightBox src="/images/sk-footstrikestability.jpg" caption="Very stable and promotes good stride" alt="" ></LightBox>

**Fit & Comfort** 

<div class="avatar-label-1" data-toggle="tooltip" title="ADITI">AD</div> 

I use UK 6 and the shoe is true to size. The shoes fit snugly on my feet, and the toe box is roomy.  The laces lock well and don’t come off while running.  The cushioning is good enough for long runs.  But during the latter kilometers, I feel the feet hitting the road harder, due to the stiffness of the midsole.  The heel collar is well padded and hugs the back of the feet very well.  It gives good grip and confidence during faster paces.  The shoe tongue is attached and is held very securely in place. I  have the future black color, it has many shades of color and is quite colorful.  

<div class="row">
    <div class="col-6 col-md-6 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/sk-forefoot.jpg" caption="Forefoot is wide and roomy" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
    <div class="col-6 col-md-6 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/sk-innersole.jpg" caption="PWRRUN+ inner sole adds softness to midsole" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
</div>

<div class="avatar-label-2" data-toggle="tooltip" title="ARAVIND">AR</div>

I use UK size 10, and the shoe fit is perfect for me.  If you are a user of Nike, Puma, or Asics, you can consider the same size.  The midsole cushioning is well balanced across the feet, so there is plenty of protection across the heel, midfoot, and forefoot.  What I like the most about the shoe is the flexibility.  The shoe bends naturally along with the foot during toe-off, which makes the ride very enjoyable. There are few studies that say, the flexibility of running shoes is one of the defining characteristics that determine shoe comfort.  I can’t agree more.

My toes run high, and that often causes cuts, blisters, and bruised toenails after the longer runs.  Kinvara’s wide forefoot shape, and stretchy upper mesh, really helps.  If you are like me and have an issue with toes, Kinvara could be a good option to consider. 

I have run in the rain quite a few times, and it is the most comfortable than any other shoe.  The upper doesn’t absorb water, nor does the midsole.  Despite not having much rubber on the outsole, the outsole grips quite well and is good for most conditions including wet roads.  However, it does have traction issues when there is loose sand.

**Packaging**

<div class="avatar-label-2" data-toggle="tooltip" title="ARAVIND">AR</div>

I like to give a shout-out to [Saucony India](https://sauconyindia.com) for the packaging of the shoe. The package has a pace chart at the back and has a space to log Personal bests.  While the utility is questionable, it is a nice touch. The package also included a cap and a saucony branded t-shirt.

<div class="row">
    <div class="col-6 col-md-6 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/sk-box.jpg" caption="Pace chart and PB log is a nice touch" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
    <div class="col-6 col-md-6 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/sk-packaging.jpg" caption="PWRRUN+ inner sole adds softness to midsole" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
</div>

**Review Summary**

<ReviewSummaryCard shoeCode="006003012M"></ReviewSummaryCard>

<ProsCard
  title="PROS"
  pros={[
    "Very versatile and can handle any type of run",  
    "Pleasing aesthetics",
    "Very good midsole bounce",
    "Low heel drop promotes natural running",
    "Extremely durable",
  ]}
/>

<ConsCard
  title="CONS"
  cons={[
    "The midsole is firmer compared to other neutral trainers",
    "May not work for heel strikers or those with niggle in the heel"
  ]}
/>

<InfoCard title="RECOMMENDATION">
    Kinvara 12 is the best neutral trainer out there.  It is the most versatile and can handle any type of run, easy, tempo, long, or speed workout.  If you are a midfoot or forefoot runner and are looking for a very versatile shoe that doesn’t interfere with your natural running, then Kinvara 12 is the go-to shoe.  
    <br/><br/>
    Rotation: 
    Kinvara can handle training up to any distance, and racing up to half-marathon.  While well-conditioned runners can use it for racing marathon distances, that space is well addressed by higher stack shoes like Saucony Endorphin, Brooks Hyperion, Puma Nitros, and Nike ZoomX.
</InfoCard>


Kinvara 12 is the lightest and most versatile daily trainer in the market. It is cushioned, low-profile and doesn't come in your way of running.

Saucony Kinvara 12 Review


Primarily coming from a background of minimalist shoe running, I didn’t experiment much with the new carbon fiber plated super shoes and shoes with modern energy-returning supercritical foams. I was curious to experience those shoes. After reading the Puma Velocity Nitro review by GeeksOnfeet (review [here](https://www.geeksonfeet.com/blog/velocitynitro/)) and having them available at good discounts on Amazon, I took the bait. The intention was to use Velocity Nitro for easy runs and LSD runs. After a couple of weeks of running, I’ve realized it wasn’t light enough that it could be used for tempo runs and intervals.  I have chanced upon Liberate Nitro, and it seemed a perfect match.  

<ShoeCard shoeCode="005004000M"></ShoeCard>

### What makes up Liberate Nitro?

Aptly named Liberate Nitro feels like the stripped-down version of its “easy and LSD run counterpart”, the Velocity Nitro. It is a neutral shoe and does not interfere with your foot’s natural pronation. It is built as a traditional shoe with a heel drop of 10mm.  With a published weight of 178g (for US9) and 192g for size for my size US 11, it is one of the lightest shoes in the Indian market. 

<LightBox src="/images/lnitro-weight.jpg" caption="One of the lightest shoes in the Indian market" alt="" ></LightBox>

**Midsole**

Unlike the Velocity Nitro, the midsole has only one layer of foam i.e. the Nitro foam. Nitro foam is made by infusing Nitrogen into EVA. This is similar to the DNAFlash foam that is found in Brooks Hyperion Tempo.  Note: Velocity nitro has 2 layers of foam, Nitro foam and ProfoamLite foam (this is a traditional EVA foam) which is on the bottom layer. The single foam layer in Liberate is to keep the weight low.  The midsole has a 30mm stack height.

<LightBox src="/images/lnitro-midsole.jpg" caption="Single layer midsole with Nitro Foam" alt="" ></LightBox>

**Upper**

The upper mesh is a mono-mesh, is very light and almost transparent, and highly breathable. It also has a gusseted tongue that spans the mid and forefoot area. 

**Heel**

Heel of the shoe is flexible but is reinforced by a semi-rigid bar which manages to keep the heel locked in place. There is minor padding on the inside part of the heel.  But the top heel counter is not padded at all and is also quite high.  So it may rub into the Achilles part of the heel for a few. 

<LightBox src="/images/lnitro-heel.jpg" caption="Stable heel, but very little padding" alt="" ></LightBox>

### RIDE IN LIBERATE NITRO

**Usage** - The shoe did not really need any break-in, at least for me, and felt right from the start. I have clocked 60 km so far in this shoe.   I have used it primarily for tempo and longer intervals, barring a couple of easy runs.  I can say it is a very comfortable and light shoe.  It comes with a good energy return the ride gets better as you speed up.  After those runs, I do not feel my legs are beaten up, unlike my minimalist shoe experience.  

With a 30mm stack height, the cushioning levels are not too high.  The shoe works very well for distances up to 10k and can be stretched for distances up to HM, both for training and races.  For longer distances, it is probably better to look out for a shoe with more cushioning. 

**Grip** - The midsole foam, which is directly exposed in the outsole, does not show any sign of wear and tear until now and the roads that I run are not too smooth either. The rubber on the outsole, the PUMA Grip rubber, is also much more sparsely distributed, to minimize the weight( in contrast to the Velocity nitro).  Even without the “Puma grip” rubber not covering the entire outsole, the road grip remains solid on wetter roads.

<LightBox src="/images/lnitro-outsole.jpg" caption="Excellent grip, despite very little rubber" alt="" ></LightBox>


**Stability**

Similar to the Velocity Nitro, Liberate Nitro also has a TPU plate inserted into the heel area that provides stability when the foot strikes the ground. 

**Fit and Comfort**

The forefoot and midfoot parts are pretty flexible and do not have any particular stability constructs. You may feel a bit odd if you are used to stability shoes quite a bit. 

The toe box is perfect, for those who do not have wide feet. The foot is securely held in place by the structure around the midfoot and there does not seem to be any sliding movement of the foot with respect to the shoe floor.

<LightBox src="/images/lnitro-topview.jpg" caption="Roomy toe box, flexible forefoot & midfoot" gallery="Liberate Nitro" alt="" ></LightBox>

Overall, it gives a very cushiony feeling and feels very comfortable when one wears it. At the same time, it gives a good ground feel and can be related to minimalist shoe experiences.  

The shoe is true to size.

**Aesthetics**

I own a fluorescent green colorway (the official name: Elektro Green-Puma Silver) which looks gorgeous and has a unique look I have not seen before in other shoes. The reflective Puma logo on the front and the reflectors on the back definitely help visibility in the dark. 

**Review Summary**

<ReviewSummaryCard shoeCode="005004000M"></ReviewSummaryCard>

<ProsCard
  title="PROS"
  pros={[
    "Very light and works extremely well for executing intervals and tempo runs.",
    "Decent cushioning from the Nitro foam makes it comfortable. The bounce from the responsive Nitro foam at higher efforts is evident.",
    "Outsole has good traction and road grip.",
    "Good stability aspects with TPU plate and heel bar.",
  ]}
/>

<ConsCard
  title="CONS"
  cons={[
    "No padding around the heel counter and the jutting of the heel counter may give some discomfort and possible chafing for some runners in the Achilles area.",
    "No data on durability. Need to wait for a few hundred km more to check.",
  ]}
/>

<InfoCard title="RECOMMENDATION">
    Liberate Nitro is highly recommended for tempo runs and speed intervals, and races up to half-marathon distances. It fills the gap in ultra-lightweight and well-cushioned trainers in the Indian market.  For those training for longer distances, this makes a good rotation for speed work, and tempo effort runs.
</InfoCard>


One of the lightest shoes in the market. Low profile, medium cushioned, and is highly recommended for speed training. Works well for training and racing distances up to half-marathon.

Puma Liberate Nitro Review

The Nike Vaporfly(VF) series of shoes have become synonymous with distance running around the world with some serious fan following. The VF series of shoes came into prominence first in early 2017 when Eliud Kipchoge ran in them in an attempt to break the 2 hour barrier in a marathon. He fell short by 26 seconds, but history was in the making. The shoe Kipchoge wore for the run, a customized version of VF 4%, grabbed lots of eyeballs. When the shoe was first released to the public in late spring 2017, it sold like hot cakes. Since then the shoe has undergone multiple iterations and has become commonplace at the holding area. 

The Nike Vaporfly Next% (VF Next%) is the third iteration in the Vaporfly series and was released in 2019. The fully carbon plated Next% is primarily a race day shoe easily capable of handling distances from a 5K to a Marathon. A premium shoe by Indian standards (pricing wise), the Next% is best suited for your race day PR (backed by a solid training). If one is looking for a carbon plated shoe amongst the ones available in the Indian market, this would be the go-to shoe. 


<ShoeCard shoeCode="002002000M"></ShoeCard>

### What makes up Next%?

**Midsole** - Uses a “Pebax” foam underfoot which Nike calls “ZoomX”. The foam while being soft has high rebound, meaning you get more bounce with every step you put in the shoe. The midsole comes with a full length __carbon fiber plate__ that provides the stiffness and the springy sensation you feel during your run. 

**Heel Drop** - The heel to toe offset is 8mm making it slightly more stable than the previous versions. There is also more foam (15% more) as compared to previous versions under your foot. More foam, more bounce, more fun. 

**Padding** - The almost collapsible heel is slightly padded while the tongue isn’t. Both are insignificant during the run 

**Lacing** - The shoe comes with offset lacing which apparently releases lacing pressure on your forefoot. 

<div class="row">
    <div class="col-6 col-md-6 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/nnxt-uppper-new.jpg" caption="Offset lacing releases pressure on forefoot" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
    <div class="col-6 col-md-6 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/nnxt-uppper-after.jpg" caption="Worn out Upper after 1000 km" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
</div>

### Ride in Next%

**Usage** - The current pair of Next% has 956KMs (documented) and may have another 30+KMs (not documented) on them. The initial hundred or so kilometers were primarily races across 5K, 10K, Marathon categories. In 2020 with the pandemic setting in and races cancelled, I started using them for my daily runs as well. I have used them for easy, tempo, intervals, long runs, races and even to just plain walk in them (only a couple of times). 

**Durability** - As with every carbon plated shoe, the life of the shoe is debated a lot. As to how long can a shoe be used while retaining its “bounciness”. With close to 1000 Kms on them, I still find them good enough for my everyday runs. Though there is substantial wear in the heel region, the forefoot is still intact. The upper is held well in spite of multiple washes and runs in rain. The bounce is still comparable to any fresh out of the box daily training shoe (read Pegasus 37 /Kinvara 10 / Beacon V2 / Nimbus 22 / Propel V2). I may not use them for races, primarily because of the condition they are in (see images) but when it comes to feel underneath your foot, they can give any other shoe a run for their money even with 1000kms on them. 

**Feel** - The shoes perform well across all categories of workouts. The midsole cushioning is soft, however the rigidity provided by the embedded carbon fiber plate gives it a bounce/springiness which propels you forward. The shoe works well at all paces. You can take them out for your easy long runs, wear them for your track workouts and they will not let you down. However, I feel the shoes perform for what they are designed to be at paces faster than 5:00/km. So, if any of your training paces are slower than 5:00, one wouldn’t get much out of these shoes. 

There is a lot spoken about how your legs still feel fresh after running long/hard workouts in these shoes, I haven’t felt that way. At least not noticeably. Often a lot of undue credit is attributed to the shoe than to your own bodies which have adapted to the training loads and have gotten stronger. 

<div class="row">    
    <div class="col-6 col-md-6 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/nnxt-outsole.jpg" caption="Outsole held up well, despite worn out heel" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
    <div class="col-6 col-md-6 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/nnxt-heelwear.jpg" caption="Heel wear after 1000km" alt="" ></LightBox>        
    </div>
</div>

**Stability**
I am an overpronator and these shoes are as unstable as they can get. But like with every other shoe, once you have run some distance, one gets used to the construction of the shoe. However, this distance varies from runner to runner.  If your initial runs haven’t gone as per your expectations, give it sometime. Run at least a couple of hundred kms in the shoe before you decide to give up on them is what I’d suggest. 

**Grip** - The shoe has a thick rubber outsole in the forefoot which grips well on road and track (surface I have used them on). The traction is good even in wet conditions and there is no slippage. The corners depending on how you tackle them can be a little tricky. I always feel one of my shoe will come off when I bend around a corner. Overall, the shoe does a decent job of tackling corners. 

**Fit and Comfort** - I use a US 10/ UK 9 in Nikes. The shoe runs true to size. The fit is just right, not too snug nor too loose. The toe box is wide enough and there is ample space for your feet to play. 

With asymmetric/offset lacing system, the lockdown on the forefoot is secure. One can play with the lacing to get the fit right. I am comfortable with the lacing that the shoe comes with and use a double knot for a tighter fit. 

Midfoot is where things start to get a little dicey, it is quite narrow and I get a feeling that my arch will fall off the shoe. More so on my right foot as it overpronates more compared to the left. This kind of settles down after you have run a few kms in the shoes. 



There isn’t much support in the heel and it is lightly padded. There is no heel slippage per se and one can use the additional eyelets for a more secure heel lockdown if one wishes to. 

The shoes can be used straight out of the box for your runs/races if you have been running in previous versions of the shoe. If these are your first pair, better to get some distance on these shoes before you decide to use them for races. 

**Aesthetics** - Nikes have always been aesthetically pleasing. The Next% look good, they look fast and feel fast too. The upper is an engineered mesh, Nike calls it the “Vaporweave”. The upper is water resistant and quite breathable. The shoe lacks visibility but that’s just a minor inconvenience. The outsole with its grooves does a good job of channeling water out from under your foot while keeping small stones away.  

### Why consider Next%?

The Next% is undoubtedly the best carbon plated shoe in the Indian Market. Consider these for your races and fast training runs if you are looking for some great bounce under your feet. The next iteration of Next%, Next% 2 is currently available with an updated upper.

### Review Summary
<ReviewSummaryCard shoeCode="002002000M"></ReviewSummaryCard>

<ProsCard
  title="PROS"
  pros={[
    "The Best carbon plated shoe in the market",
    "Aesthetically pleasing",
  ]}
/>

<ConsCard
  title="CONS"
  cons={[
    "Unstable",
    "Price",
  ]}
/>

<InfoCard title="RECOMMENDATION">
All kinds of runs- Long/Easy, Tempo, Intervals, Racing for 5K and above. Rotate with any other non-plated shoe so that on your race day, the plated shoe will make you fly.
</InfoCard>

1000 km review of Nike Vaporfly Next%. Verdict- The Best carbon plated shoe in the market.

Nike Vaporfly Next% Review

Brooks launched the original Hyperion back in 2019. It was a modest racing flat which received good reviews, and then in 2020 they launched their Hyperion series with The Hyperion Elite (a Carbon plated super shoe) and the Hyperion Tempo, which according to Brooks is a shoe specifically designed for race training.

A race training shoe is something nearly as light and as fast as a racing shoe, but at the same time equally durable as a daily trainer. Hyperion Tempo uses the same DNA Flash midsole as used by Hyperion Elite 2,  and the key difference is the stack height and the carbon plate. 

Other super shoes that have similar race training counterparts are:

* Nike Alphafly Next% & Nike Air Zoom Tempo Next%
* Saucony Endorphin Pro 2 & Saucony Speed 2
* Adidas Adios Pro 2 & Adidas Boston 10
* Nike Vaporfly next% & Nike Pegasus Turbo 2  

<ShoeCard shoeCode="007006000M"></ShoeCard>


### What makes up Hyperion Tempo?

**Midsole** - The DNA Flash midsole (which is very similar to Skechers Hyperburst and Puma Nitro) is EVA foam infused with Nitrogen. The cushioning is not very bouncy and it gives a fairly decent amount of ground feel and at the same time provides enough protection. 

**Stack Height** - With 31mm at the heel and 23m at the forefoot, the shoe provides an 8mm offset, which is good for midfoot and forefoot strikers, and just enough for heel strikers.

**Upper & lacing** - The synthetic upper is the best that I have seen on any shoe so far. It's quite thin and lightweight, and has a lot of pores in the forefoot making it very breathable. It does not retain water, and is very efficient in hot and rainy climates, though I feel it might not be very ideal for colder climates. The tongue is thin and slightly padded and is complimented with thin elastic laces (The first of its kind that I have used). 

<div class="row">
    <div class="col-6 col-md-6 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/ht-topview.jpg" caption="Lightweight and comfortable" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
    <div class="col-6 col-md-6 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/frontview.jpg" caption="Breathable and roomy" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
</div>

**Design** - Even though Brooks does not explicitly mention this, the shoe has a rocker design, that helps in heel / mid foot transitions - Forefoot and makes the run much more efficient and economical.  

**Weight** - At 205gms the Hyperion tempo has officially dethroned the king of all lightweight Training shoes, the Pegasus Turbo 2 (215gms), and as of date this is the lightest running shoe in my rack. 

**Aesthetics** - I own the one with a black upper & a turquoise blue sole, and it's simply beautiful. The design is subtle yet elegant and the colors are vibrant.

### Ride in Hyperion Tempo

**Usage** - I have used the HT for a wide variety of paces all the way from Easy (6:10min/km) to Racing (46min 10k). The lightweight, rocker structure of the HT makes any run a cruise. There is very little bounce and the midsole returns as much energy as one gives it. This makes running very efficient at any pace, up to 25km.

**Feel** - The DNA Flash midsole is light and at the same time returns as much or more energy that is thrown at it. The lightweight midsole lets the foot glide effortlessly.

**Stability** - The shoe is stable and provides good arch support as well. 

<div class="row">    
    <div class="col-6 col-md-6 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/heelview.jpg" caption="Heel support is good" alt="" ></LightBox>
     </div>
    <div class="col-6 col-md-6 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/outsole.jpg" caption="Outsole has good grip" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
</div>

**Grip** - HT feels extremely agile in both dry, wet and specifically rainy conditions. Few midsoles (especially Nike react) tend to absorb water and this makes the shoe very squishy during runs on rainy days. DNA Flash however doesn’t absorb as much as I've experienced with other shoes. 

**Fit and Comfort** - HT gives the foot a very good and comfortable lockdown. And never even once during my runs have I had to stop to retie my laces. The only concern I have with the upper is its durability.

**Durability** - After 500kms I have noticed some bit of wear and tear on the ankle liners. The outsole treads are intact and I think these are definitely good for another 500 kms.

### Why consider Hyperion Tempo?

**Price** - At ₹ 13500/- these shoes definitely don't come cheap, but Brooks India has been generous enough to give a flat 10% through their influencers.  Compared to other Race training shoes, the HT is priced on par. Adidas Boston 10 - ₹ 13,999/-, Nike Air Zoom Tempo Next% - (which is sold at a discounted rate of  ₹ 14,007 & the actual price is ₹ 17,595/-). And compared to the other popular daily trainers, these are sold at a 30% premium.



**HT is for you, if ...**

+ You already have your shoe rotation sorted and now you are looking at a new tempo trainer. 
+ You are a serious runner who has an easy day shoe and a race day shoe in rotation, it makes a lot of sense to add a tempo/training shoe to your current shoe rotation, just to bring down the number of miles you clock on your precious race day super shoes, and rather preserve them for your race day.
+ You are a runner who has been using daily trainers for a while now and want to give yourself an upgrade. 
+ You are a shoe geek and would love to try out new tech, this is definitely worth considering
+ You are looking for a single shoe for racing and training, you can still consider this if your racing distance is up to half marathon.

**This is probably is not the right shoe, if ...**

+ You are looking for a shoe that is cheaper and more versatile,  then daily trainers are recommended.
+ You are looking for a shoe that would take you beyond 25k - You might want to consider a shoe with larger stack height.  

**Suggested Rotation:**

In my current shoe rotation, I use the 

+ Nike Infinity for my easy / long runs
+ HT for mid distance tempo
+ Endorphin Pro 2 for the fast and long days

### Review Summary
<ReviewSummaryCard shoeCode="007006000M"></ReviewSummaryCard>

<ProsCard
  title="PROS"
  pros={[
    "Extremely Light Weight",
    "Stable Ride",
    "Very good traction",
    "Effective foot lockdown",
    "Breathable upper",
  ]}
/>

<ConsCard
  title="CONS"
  cons={[
    "May not be durable beyond 900 kms",
    "Not suitable for long runs beyond 25km",
  ]}
/>

<InfoCard title="RECOMMENDATION">
<p>Brooks Hyperion tempo is my go to shoe for training. The lightweight and versatility gives confidence to take it for any morning run. The only exception being longer runs over 25k.</p>
<p>I would definitely recommend this brilliant package for training and racing short to medium distances. Happy Running.</p>
</InfoCard>

500km review of the Brooks Hyperion Tempo (HT). How it rides, what kind of runs it works best and how it stacks up against similar shoes in the market.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Review

If you have used the ASICS Gel Hyper Speed series of racing flats, you will be in for a surprise with the latest avatar of ASICS Hyper Speed.  In the past, it has been a lightweight shoe with a low heel drop and just enough cushioning. New Hyper Speed while maintains the good parts, it is a very different shoe. 

At the higher end of the running shoe market, shoes have completely changed over the last 4 years - high stack heights, rocker bottoms, and lightweight foams. However, at the lower end of the market, things haven’t. Asics Hyper Speed takes a fresh perspective at the lower end of the market segment.  

### What makes up Hyper Speed?

<LightBox src="/images/hyperspeed-rocker.jpg" caption="Hyper Speed's Rocker Geometry" alt="" ></LightBox>

Hyper Speed has a rocker midsole design, with a high stack height and high toe spring. 

__Geometry:__  Hyper Speed is a rocker-bottom shoe. Rocker-bottom shoes are popularized by Hoka One One, and now have become mainstream. Rockers help runners to transition from landing to toe-off smoothly, and are supposed to help better running economy.  As can be seen in the picture, rockers have a high toe spring angle and an exaggerated heel spring. Asics says Hyper Speed’s geometry was inspired by its Guidesole design. Guidesole is used by Asics, for their other rocker shoes such as Meta Ride, Glide Ride, and Evo Ride.

__MidSole:__ Midsole is made of spEVA (a blend of EVA and rubber). Blending rubber with EVA supposed to make the shoe more bouncier. The midsole has a relatively high stack height (30mm) for a shoe in this category. High stack height also helps with running economy. The shoe has an 8mm drop from heel to toe.

__Upper:__ Upper is a mesh structure and is made of very lightweight and breathable material, to help the runs to be more comfortable. 

<ShoeCard shoeCode="004004008M"></ShoeCard>


### Why buy Hyper Speed?

<div class="d-flex-inline float-left">
<div class="avatar mr-10 float-left" data-toggle="tooltip" title="SHARANYA">
    <span class="avatar-text avatar-text-primary circle"><span class="initial-wrap"><span>SH</span></span>
    </span>
</div>
</div>

My training mileage has increased recently with longer runs and faster workouts. I am on the lookout for a new shoe that can handle the volume and intensity. Another criteria I have is the price. Hyper Speed matched my needs perfectly. 

<div class="d-flex-inline float-left">
<div class="avatar mr-10 float-left" data-toggle="tooltip" title="ARAVIND">
    <span class="avatar-text avatar-text-grey  circle"><span class="initial-wrap"><span>AR</span></span>
    </span>
</div>
</div>

Recently I started my speed training in preparation for the upcoming season of races. Asics Gel DS Trainer that I use reached its end of life. I am on the lookout for a shoe that is light weight, and good for speed training. Hyper Speed seemed to fit the bill perfectly. A rocker bottom design, high toe spring, high stack height, and extremely lightweight shoe for under 5000 rupees I thought is a steal. 


<div class="row">
    <div class="col-6 col-md-3 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/hs-forefoot.jpg" caption="Breathable and Roomy" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
    <div class="col-6 col-md-3 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/hs-heel.jpg" caption="Good Heel Support" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
    <div class="col-6 col-md-3 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/hs-outsole.jpg" caption="Grip works for tarred roads" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
    <div class="col-6 col-md-3 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/hs-cushion.jpg" caption="Bouncy cushioning" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
</div>


### Running in Hyper Speed

<div class="d-flex-inline float-left">
    <div class="avatar mr-10 float-left" data-toggle="tooltip" title="SHARANYA">
        <span class="avatar-text avatar-text-primary circle"><span class="initial-wrap"><span>SH</span></span>
        </span>
    </div>
</div>

I have run more than 50 KM so far.  Used them for Tempo runs, intervals, fartlek, and hill workouts. It is great for faster workouts such as tempos and fartlek runs. It is much lighter compared to shoes I used in this range, which definitely helps me in speed. The cushioning is bouncy to give an extra push from the ground. The cushioning keeps the foot firm while running, also provides stability, and is very comfortable. 

<div class="d-flex-inline float-left">
<div class="avatar mr-10 float-left" data-toggle="tooltip" title="ARAVIND">
    <span class="avatar-text avatar-text-grey circle"><span class="initial-wrap"><span>AR</span></span>
    </span>
</div>
</div>

I have run about 90 KM in these shoes for easy runs, recovery runs, interval runs, and tempo runs. The shoes handled all of them well.  

+ __Easy Runs__ are very comfortable in these shoes. It provides decent cushioning, good for easy and recovery runs.
+ __Interval Runs__ are when geometry and aggressive toe spring really come into effect. The transition from mid-foot to forefoot is extremely smooth when taking off. The geometry encourages forefoot strike. Here is the foot strike as observed when running in Asics Gel DS Trainer (mid-foot strike) and Asics Hyper Speed (fore-foot strike). (courtesy: [runmechanics.in](https://runmechanics.in)). 

<LightBox src="/images/hyperspeed-footstrike.jpg" caption="Hyper Speed promotes Forefoot strike (click to zoom)" alt="" ></LightBox>

+ __Tempo Runs__ can really take advantage of the bounce offered. But don’t expect too much bounce like that offered by foams like PEBA or e-TPU.  spEVA midsole cushioning is very firm and works very well as a daily trainer for shorter runs under 15k.  Longer runs beyond 15k, one can feel the fatigue.  

Rocker design, aggressive toe spring, and excessive heel spring can be uncomfortable and may need getting used to for heel strikers.  



**Fit and Comfort**

<div class="d-flex-inline float-left">
<div class="avatar mr-10 float-left" data-toggle="tooltip" title="SHARANYA">
    <span class="avatar-text avatar-text-primary circle"><span class="initial-wrap"><span>SH</span></span>
    </span>
</div>
</div>

Having a wider foot, and a bunion problem, I was worried about the fit. But it wasn't a problem. The flexible upper gives a good amount of space for movement inside the shoe. The forefoot is roomy and yet secure while running. I've felt the impact on the knees is much lower. I got used to the shoes’ feel after just a half an hour of running. The mesh upper feels light and loose because of the breathable material. Lacing is good, and it is easy to wear shoes as well. The only problem I faced was that the tongue of the shoe is a little uncomfortable. Tongue crumples and can chafe if you are not wearing good socks. 

<div class="d-flex-inline float-left">
<div class="avatar mr-10 float-left" data-toggle="tooltip" title="ARAVIND">
    <span class="avatar-text avatar-text-grey  circle"><span class="initial-wrap"><span>AR</span></span>
    </span>
</div>
</div>

It is true to size and fits the same as other Asics shoes that I have used. The mesh upper has rough edges and is not the best. The sock liner is surprisingly thin and attaches itself to the midsole with glue. The heel of the shoe is very well padded and locks perfectly, which is very important for those faster interval runs.

**Stability**

<div class="d-flex-inline float-left">
<div class="avatar mr-10 float-left" data-toggle="tooltip" title="SHARANYA">
    <span class="avatar-text avatar-text-primary circle"><span class="initial-wrap"><span>SH</span></span>
    </span>
</div>
</div>

The shoes are light but at the same time are very good with stability. When I add a lot of
Mileage in a week, the runs towards the end of the week were on fatigued legs. Stability is important to avoid injuries. These shoes feel very stable for faster runs even on fatigued legs. 

<div class="d-flex-inline float-left">
<div class="avatar mr-10 float-left" data-toggle="tooltip" title="ARAVIND">
    <span class="avatar-text avatar-text-grey  circle"><span class="initial-wrap"><span>AR</span></span>
    </span>
</div>
</div>

While the stack height is big, the wider base keeps the shoe stable enough for shorter runs.  Stability is better compared to other neutral racing flats.  Here is a comparative graph between Reebok Run Fast 2 and Asics Hyper Speed.  Pronation angle averaged at 12 degrees for Run Fast 2, while Hyper Speed is quite stable at about 10.5 degrees.  (courtesy: [runmechanics.in](https://runmechanics.in)) 

<LightBox src="/images/hyperspeed-stability.jpg" caption="Stability is good enough (click to zoom)" alt="" ></LightBox>

**Aesthetics**

<div class="d-flex-inline float-left">
<div class="avatar mr-10 float-left" data-toggle="tooltip" title="SHARANYA">
    <span class="avatar-text avatar-text-primary circle"><span class="initial-wrap"><span>SH</span></span>
    </span>
</div>
</div>

The darker colourway that I have is simple and looks very neat. The trademark Asics tiger makes it look fast and classy.  The shoes are easy to clean and dry very fast. The sole of the shoe does not pick up stones or leaves.

### Review Summary
<ReviewSummaryCard shoeCode="004004008M"></ReviewSummaryCard>

<ProsCard
  title="PROS"
  pros={[
    "Breathable, roomy, and comfortable to wear",
    "Rocker bottom is great for faster runs like tempos and intervals",
    "Firm cushioning protects well from shock",
    "Excellent value for Money",
  ]}
/>

<ConsCard
  title="CONS"
  cons={[
    "The tongue of the shoe is slightly uncomfortable",
    "Road grip is not the best in its class",
    "Not so comfortable for distance beyond 15K",
  ]}
/>

<InfoCard title="RECOMMENDATION">
<p>Highly recommended as a daily trainer for speed workouts, and short distance races up to 10k.</p>
<p>For those looking to use rocker-bottom racers or looking to transition to midfoot strike, Hyper Speed is an excellent transitionary shoe.</p> 
<p>Under 5000 rupees it is the best in its class.</p> 
</InfoCard>

Multi-tester review of ASICS Hyper Speed (Men & Women editions): A lightweight, and fast rocker shoe in the budget. Works well for speed workouts, short to medium-distance training runs, and races under 10K.

ASCIS Hyper Speed Review


The second iteration of the Saucony Endorphin Pro was launched just a month back and kudos to [Saucony India](https://www.sauconyindia.com/) [@sauconyindia](https://www.instagram.com/sauconyindia/) for bringing it to India in such a short time. 

#### "If it isn’t broken, don’t fix it!"

The Endorphin Pro 2 is pretty much similar to the first edition and I’m glad that they didn’t tinker much with the shoe.  The first edition received raving reviews as a genuine contender to Nike’s Vaporfly and Alphafly. So it’s no surprise that Saucony has stuck closely to their winning formula. 

All the big-ticket items - their SPEEDROLL technology, ultralight PWRRUNPB midsole foam, carbon-plate, return, with only a few minor adaptations to the upper of the shoe. 

The Endorphin line-up is Saucony’s performance series that uses the SPEEDROLL technology. According to their website, "Speedroll tech is an advanced footwear geometry that gives you an effortless, always-forward feel"! In simple language, it is a rocker design that always gives the runner a forward lean and makes the transition (for heel or midfoot strikers) to forefoot more efficient. 

PWRRRUNPB uses PEBAX, which is a lightweight, high-performance thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) that is known for its flexibility and energy return and is used by other super shoes for Nike (Zoom X Foam), Reebok (Floatride Plus Foam). Decathlon Kalenji Kiprun ultralight racer also has a PEBAX midsole.  PEBAX is often said to be better than e-TPU or gas infused EVA foams.

<ShoeCard shoeCode="006001002M"></ShoeCard>

At 213 gms these aren’t the lightest shoes I’ve used (Brooks Hyperion Tempo - 205 gms), but I can definitely live with an extra 10gms for a carbon plate.

The Formfit upper is quite snug in the forefoot, but a little loose at the heel, but this is not a deal-breaker. The Saucony Endorphin Speed 2 on the other hand comes with a heel counter, which gives a very good fit, and at 225 gms, it's just barely 10gms heavier!

Perhaps the biggest change, then, is a visual one – the race-flag colourway makes the Endorphin Pro 2 stand out from the crowd. However, we still don’t have that colourway available in India as yet and what I have is a bright orange one. 

#### Fast, Faster, Fastest…

Within the Endorphin line-up, the Endorphin Pro 2 is their lightest and fastest race day shoe. I would recommend them only for sub 5:00 min/km pace tempo runs and Races. One review mentioned that these were best used for a sub 7:00 min/mile pace! Now Speed is a very relative term and what is fast for me is slow for someone and vice versa. 

There are a lot of reports online which mention that carbon plates mess with our natural gait and I would partially tend to agree with these. This is one of the reasons why most runners use them for race days and speed work. The aggressive ride would be quite uncomfortable at easy speeds (which is relative). And for people looking out for a slightly more versatile shoe, the Endorphin Speed 2 should fit the bill. 

<div class="row">
    <div class="col-6 col-md-3 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/ep2front.png" caption="Roomy toe box" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
    <div class="col-6 col-md-3 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/ep2rear.png" caption="Heel is a bit loose" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
    <div class="col-6 col-md-3 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/ep2bottom.png" caption="Grip is great for tarred roads" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
    <div class="col-6 col-md-3 px-1">
        <LightBox src="/images/ep2top.png" caption="Comfortable upper" alt="" ></LightBox>
    </div>
</div>

#### Ride Experience

As of now, I've done three workouts totalling about 26.2miles (40+ km) on these. The runs have been a mix of intervals (3:30 - 4:00  min/km), and threshold/tempo runs (4:30 - 5:00 min/km). 

The aggressive ride of the shoe, both because of the carbon plate and their speed roll, makes it a little easier to run fast. But please note, it does not make one run fast. I can pick up these paces with a normal shoe as well, but the Endorphin Pro 2 makes my running a little more efficient. And this is also the reason why it's tough to run slow on these because the geometry of the shoe does not support slow easy runs. And in all these runs I've ended up doing all my cool down at a 5:00 pace (which is not very ideal). So I've just restricted them for runs at specific paces. 

Another thing that I observed is that the shoe is stable at higher speeds and not so much at slower paces. This could be because of two reasons


1. The carbon plate gives the runner a good push forward and the aggressive speed roll keeps us darting forward. 
2. At slower paces, the bounce in the shoes is quite high and the carbon plate gives it a trampoline effect. 

The more I run in them, the more I feel better at controlling them. This could be because I'm technically breaking into the shoe or it could be more of a mental adjustment (like getting used to riding a superbike).

One more observation here is that the shoe feels the same throughout the run, even those harder final kilometers. 

#### Why bother buying the Endorphin PRO 2 then?

**The Feel**

The ride is brilliant and second to none. It has to be experienced! The PWRRUN PB foam is really soft and the carbon plate compliments it well. The foam doesn’t bottom out and at the same time, the plate gives a good forward push. Even with a stack height of 35.5mm in the heel and 27.5mm in the forefoot, the shoe is extremely stable and the forward roll makes running very efficient. The cushioning is good throughout the midsole and the forefoot is also well-cushioned. 

The road grip on dry tar surfaces is fantastic, but I would be a little more cautious with wet surfaces. 

**Unit Economics**

The Endorphin Pro 2 is priced at Rs.17990/- and Saucony India has been giving a 10% discount through their influencers which brings the price down to Rs.16190/-, which is pretty much equal to the price in USD ($200).

The other options in this category like Nike Vaporfly Next% 2 (Rs.19695), Nike Alphafly (Rs.22795), Brooks Hyperion Elite 2 (Rs.22999), Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 2 (Rs.21999), and Asics Metaspeed sky (Rs.21999) are priced at approximately (25 - 38)%  over the Endorphin Pro 2!

This is where Unit economics kicks in. A typical running shoe lasts about 700 miles post which could be used as a gym / casual shoe. However, racing shoes with carbon plates have a large stack height, which makes them pretty uncomfortable for regular gym use or even casual walking. So the life of the shoe is pretty much the miles you can run in them, which is probably around (250 - 300)miles. 

Based on the reports I’ve read, Endorphin Pro 2 can last around 400 miles (640 km). But even if it gives me a few more km over other race shoes, at a 25 - 38% price benefit I’m still spending much less per KM!

#### Shoe Rotation

Running shoes are quite expensive and it is imperative that we find the right balance in our shoe rotation. Else your shoe will just end up as one amongst others on the shoe rack. So here is how I use these shoes and the following is my current shoe rotation.

1. Endorphin Pro 2 - For speed work (Intervals - Threshold - Tempo runs and Time Trial/Racing). 
2. Brooks Hyperion Tempo: For Tempo - Easy runs
3. Nike Infinity React 1: For Easy - Recovery Runs.

### Review Summary
<ReviewSummaryCard shoeCode="006001002M"></ReviewSummaryCard>

<ProsCard
  title="PROS"
  pros={[
    "Stable Ride",
    "Efficient running (Speedroll)",
    "Fantastic Breathable upper",
    "Durability",
  ]}
/>

<ConsCard
  title="CONS"
  cons={[
    "Not the Lightest in its category",
    "Average foot lockdown",
    "Average traction",
  ]}
/>

<InfoCard title="RECOMMENDATION">
To conclude, the Endorphin PRO 2 is a fantastic race shoe and I think it’s definitely a bang for one's buck.  It is not perfect and has its share of misses, but then its Pros outweigh the Cons. I would definitely recommend them.
</InfoCard>




26.2 mile Run review of the Saucony’s Endorphin Pro 2 super shoe:  How it rides, what kind of runs it works best, how it stacks up against the first edition, and the unit economics compared to other super-shoes in the market.

Saucony Endorphin Pro 2 Review

I have been a long-time user of Puma Running Shoes. Really loved running in various versions of Faas 500, and Faas 300. They were very durable, value for money, and most importantly are available in every Puma store in India. However, Puma’s running shoes over the last few years such as NetFit, Hybrid have not been very exciting in terms of innovation. Puma's competition has lead the innovation with carbon plates, rocker bottoms, high stack shoes, PEBA midsoles and more. The most recent shoes that I have used from Puma’s stable were - _Speed 300 and Hybrid Runner_. Speed 300 with Proplate (TPU plate in the midsole) is interesting but nowhere close to other shoes with similar plates such as Asics GlideRide or Nike Air Zoom Tempo Next%. Puma Hybrid Runner did not suit me well. Those are clunky and heavy. I had almost dropped Puma my running shoe shopping, if not for the recent launch of the Nitro line-up.  The Nitro line-up has rekindled my interest in Puma’s running shoe line-up.

### Puma’s Nitro Line-up

The Nitro line-up included 4 shoes, Deviate Nitro (Regular and Elite versions), Velocity Nitro, Liberate Nitro, Eternity Nitro.  Each of these shoes come with their own uniqueness. Nitro Foam uses a new manufacturing process and infuses Nitrogen into EVA foam, which makes it light and bouncy.  Nitro foam has got very good feedback from the running community. Velocity Nitro and Deviate Nitro has scores of 91 and 90 on shoe review aggregator RunRepeat.com.  Kudos to Puma for launching the Nitro line-up at the same time as their global launch. Very rarely we see Shoe companies launch their latest shoes in India coinciding with their global launch.

<ShoeCard shoeCode="005003000M"></ShoeCard>

### What makes up Velocity Nitro

Velocity Nitro, as the name suggests uses Nitro foam for the midsole. The midsole is made up of two layers of foam, the top layer is the Nitro foam (nitrogen-infused EVA foam),  and there is a thin second layer made up of ProfoamLite foam(also an EVA based foam but is more firm).  ProfoamLite was introduced last year with Puma’s UltraRide shoe. The outsole uses new PUMAGRIP rubber.

<LightBox src="/images/pumaburger.jpg" caption="Layered midsole (source:puma.com)" alt="" ></LightBox>

The upper is an engineered mesh with two layers.  The outer layer uses a breathable material and gives colour to the shoe. The layer beneath is more structured and seems to give shape to the shoe and its toe box. The tongue is attached below it with a much smoother fabric. The heel is supported by TPU based heel counter and it is solid. The heel collar has ample cushioning to make it comfortable. The shoe also uses a different last for the women’s edition, so women runners probably have a more comfortable fit.

### Why am I excited

<LightBox src="/images/topview.jpg" caption="" alt="" ></LightBox>

Puma positions Velocity Nitro as a daily trainer that can be used for speed work, long runs, tempo runs, or easy runs, an all-rounder. I like the Nike Pegasus line-up of shoes, which are my daily trainers ever since Pegasus 33.  However, I didn’t like Nike’s recent change in direction with Pegasus 37. I have been looking for an alternative daily trainer. I was also hoping it could even fit in as a replacement for Pegasus Turbo, given “Velocity” in its title.  Priced at Rs.10,999, with several deals on offer and it is an easy decision for me to pick one.

### Running in Velocity Nitro

I ran in them for easy runs, speed workouts, long runs, and some tempo workouts. As a daily trainer, the shoe handled all these runs reasonably well.  It is comfortable, bouncy, and has speed when needed.

**Easy Runs**

My first run was an easy 10k run.  My first impression of the shoe is it is extremely comfortable.  The fit was perfect, the midsole cushioning is extremely good, and the ride was smooth. That gave me hope that it could be a good Pegasus turbo replacement for speed work. The shoe felt natural and no break-in was needed.

**Tempo Runs**

Next up was a 4x 1mile tempo interval run.  The first rep wasn’t that great. The cushioning was a bit too much and interfered with the run. The responsiveness was not that great. However, as I progressed, it got better. The cushioning hardened a bit and the midsole got bouncier and responsive and helped with the speed. Overall I felt the cushioning is good, and there is decent bounce and energy return, but it is no comparison to Pegasus Turbo.

**Speed Work**

Later I tried it for 4x 400m interval workout as well as 4x 200m.  The weight of the shoe and slight mushiness in the midsole didn’t lend it very well for speed intervals. I wouldn’t recommend it for speed work. I prefer lighter and less cushioned shoes for speed intervals.



**Long Runs**

Two weeks after I first used it, I wore it for a long run (easy pace). The shoe handled the distance very well.  As the kilometers passed by the cushioning ensure the fatigue is at bay. A perfectly fit toe box made it very comfortable for the forefoot.  The breathability of the shoe is excellent as well. Post-run recovery is better than other shoes that I normally use.

**Road Grip**

<LightBox src="/images/outersole.jpg" caption="PUMAGRIP handles Indian roads very well" alt="" ></LightBox>

Indian roads can be very tricky and in my tests is how it handled the different terrains.  Summer rains in Bangalore allowed me to try it on wet roads. Roads laden with sand, construction debris are very common too.  The grip and traction are good and gives a lot of confidence.  It could handle speed intervals on sandy roads with no problems.

**Fit and Comfort**

I have clocked about 130km of mileage so far. It is one of the most comfortable shoes that I have used so far. The inside of the shoe is smooth, and I could even run with the shoe without the sock liner. I like the forefoot to be roomy, and it is perfect.  Velocity Nitro got the laces right, and they stay in place and don’t slip. The shoe is true to its size.  If you are using Nike or Asics it is almost the same size.

<LightBox src="/images/sockliner.jpg" caption="Very comfortable to run in, even without the sock liner" alt="" ></LightBox>

**Stability**

Velocity Nitro is a neutral shoe. There are no features that interfere with natural pronation.  I felt the shoe is very stable for typical neutral daily training (as good as Pegasus 35 / 36). TPU heel counter gives structure to the shoe and probably helps with stability.  The dual-layered midsole also seems to help the stability.

<LightBox src="/images/heel.jpg" caption="Heel Counter offers good stability to rearfoot" alt="" ></LightBox>

**Aesthetics**

While it can be subjective, I liked the looks of the shoe.  The fluorescent orange colorway really looks nice and bright for road running. The reflective Puma logo in the front, and also the reflective elements behind the heel counter are well placed. Visibility spoiler inserted in between the two layers of the midsole and wrapped around the heel is very well thought out.  Shoelaces are very easy to operate. Tongue with Velocity Nitro written adds a nice aesthetic touch.

<LightBox src="/images/toebox.jpg" caption="Heel Counter offers good stability to rearfoot" alt="" ></LightBox>

### Review Summary

<ReviewSummaryCard shoeCode="005003000M"></ReviewSummaryCard>

<ProsCard
  title="PROS"
  pros={[
    "A well-rounded daily trainer can handle any type of run.",
    "The responsive midsole can help with speed during tempo runs, except for speed intervals.",
    "Excellent cushioning and works very well for long runs, and recovery runs.",
    "The outsole has good traction on the road and works well with Indian roads.",
    "Good stability for a neutral trainer.",
    "Smoothly constructed inside makes it easy to break-in.",
  ]}
/>

<ConsCard
  title="CONS"
  cons={[
    "Slightly heavier for race day or speed/interval work.",
    "Cushioning is a bit mushy at the beginning of the run.",
    "Upper fabric collects dust easily, however, it is easy to clean.",
  ]}
/>

<InfoCard title="RECOMMENDATION">
    Recommended as a daily trainer handling tempo runs, easy runs, and long runs.
    <br></br>
    <h6>Suggested rotation:</h6>
    <li>Speed work - A slightly less cushioned shoe as Puma Speed 300 Racer 2 or Asics Hyper Speed</li>
    <li>Racing - Puma Deviate Nitro or Nike VaporFly Next%</li>
</InfoCard>

Reviews